| | ::::I was just recommending the way new senses or splitting a generic senses would work, in my opinion, provided the most common sense stays at the top. Yes, {{temp|trreq}} is better for new senses or just no translation at all (copy from other senses if sure). I wouldn't add {{temp|trreq}} for languages with few contributors. They would just sit there. If someone wants to add a translation for each sense, they can do so. --[[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] <sup>([[User talk:Atitarev|обсудить]])</sup> 01:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | | ::::I was just recommending the way new senses or splitting a generic senses would work, in my opinion, provided the most common sense stays at the top. Yes, {{temp|trreq}} is better for new senses or just no translation at all (copy from other senses if sure). I wouldn't add {{temp|trreq}} for languages with few contributors. They would just sit there. If someone wants to add a translation for each sense, they can do so. --[[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] <sup>([[User talk:Atitarev|обсудить]])</sup> 01:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
| | + | I'm still not getting why you consider CSHD to be too encyclopedic. It follows the same format as many food articles, describing what's in it. Therefore it's no more encyclopedic than any of them [[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="purple">Purplebackpack89</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="FFAB00">(Notes Taken)</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Purplebackpack89|<font color="FFAB00">(Locker)</font>]]</sup> 20:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言