| User talk:Metaknowledge Dec 23rd 2012, 07:45 Speaking of plurals: new section | ← Older revision | Revision as of 07:45, 23 December 2012 | | Line 248: | Line 248: | | | Re {{diff|19074146}}, we haven't actually decided on the ''ch'' vs. ''kh'' question. (See [[WT:AHE]], which indicates as much.) So there's no reason to make that change (or its reversion).<span class="Unicode">​—[[User:Msh210|msh210]]℠</span> ([[user talk:Msh210|talk]]) 07:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | Re {{diff|19074146}}, we haven't actually decided on the ''ch'' vs. ''kh'' question. (See [[WT:AHE]], which indicates as much.) So there's no reason to make that change (or its reversion).<span class="Unicode">​—[[User:Msh210|msh210]]℠</span> ([[user talk:Msh210|talk]]) 07:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | | :Can we choose one? I don't think I've ever before seen a Hebrew entry that didn't have substandard formatting and yet used ''ch''. I think using ''kh'' is the best option, but any standardization is for the best. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 07:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | :Can we choose one? I don't think I've ever before seen a Hebrew entry that didn't have substandard formatting and yet used ''ch''. I think using ''kh'' is the best option, but any standardization is for the best. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 07:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | | + | | | | + | == Speaking of plurals == | | | + | | | | + | So now that I (presumably) know what your line of work is, there are a couple of things with which I thought you might be able to help me. Firstly, some Spanish nouns that form plurals by adding ''-es'' can be pluralized by simple adding "es" in the noun template after the gender, but I can't do the same with adjectives. Also while "|p=" works for adding an irregular plural form in nouns "|pl=" is needed with adjectives. The way I see it being able to add "es" and using "p" for both would be ideal. Secondly, I was working with Friulian entries a short while back and plurals are much more regular. Usually it's adding ''-s'' (which is already available as the default plural), but with nouns ending in ''-e'' it's ''-is'': {{term|ìsule|lang=fur}} » {{term|ìsulis|lang=fur}} and for nouns ending in ''-l'' or ''-li'' it's ''-i'': {{term|vescul|lang=fur}} » {{term|vescui|lang=fur}}. The plurals I've done so far I did manually, but it'd be great to have some sort of template, if you can give me hand. I hope I'm not being overbearing. /: —[[User:Koszmonaut|Koszmonaut]] ([[User talk:Koszmonaut|talk]]) 07:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | |  |
沒有留言:
張貼留言