Created page with "{{rfd-deleted|text={{fake== |<s>public sex</s> }} public + sex. NB we don't seem to have a sense at public#Adjective to cover this. Nevertheless, SoP. [[User:Mglovesf..."
New page
{{rfd-deleted|text={{fake== |<s>[[public sex]]</s> }} public + sex. NB we don't seem to have a sense at [[public#Adjective]] to cover this. Nevertheless, SoP. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 07:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC) *No strong feelings on the term in question, but I have added the relevant sense at {{term|public}}. <{{#switch:|term|ital=i|head|bold=b|span}} class="latinx" {{#if:|lang="{{{lang}}}"}}>[[User:Widsith|Ƿidsiþ]]</{{#switch:|term|ital=i|head|bold=b|span}}> 11:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC) :Certainly seems non-idiomatic. I doubt that it is a set phrase. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 21:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC) ::It would seem to fail the set-phrase coordination test, often appearing in expressions like "private/semi-public and public sex". [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 21:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC) : Is this a legal term in any way? [[User talk:DAVilla|DAVilla]] 19:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC) ::It may appear in legal glossaries, the same way that [[paracetamol]] may appear in medical glossaries. However paracetamol is the same thing in and out of medical glossaries, and I suspect the same is true for public sex. Furthermore for countries that do define it in a statue or statutes in English, the definitions likely aren't identical anyway. --[[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC) '''deleted''' -- [[User:Liliana-60|Liliana]] [[User talk:Liliana-60|•]] 05:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC) }}
沒有留言:
張貼留言