| | Hi there - please can you help, was my entry of [[αγνώριστος]] as an antonym for [[ευδιάκριτος]] - was that a big blunder on my part? Is the a subtlety I'm missing here? cheers [[User:Saltmarsh|Saltmarsh]]<sup><font color="green">[[User talk:Saltmarsh|απάντηση]]</font></sup> 16:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC) | | Hi there - please can you help, was my entry of [[αγνώριστος]] as an antonym for [[ευδιάκριτος]] - was that a big blunder on my part? Is the a subtlety I'm missing here? cheers [[User:Saltmarsh|Saltmarsh]]<sup><font color="green">[[User talk:Saltmarsh|απάντηση]]</font></sup> 16:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC) |
| | :Something is «ευδιάκριτο» when we can see it because it is big enough or the weather is clear enough or the light is sufficient. On the other hand something has become «αγνώριστο» when it has changed so much that we can not recognize it. [[αναγνωρίσιμος]] can be used as an antonym of [[αγνώριστος]], but be careful. When something is «αγνώριστο», it is not «αναγνωρίσιμο» - unless we exagerate, something that happens very often with this word- but when something is not «αναγνωρίσιμο», it doesn't necessarily mean that it is «αγνώριστο». Another difference is that [[αγνώριστος]] is rather colloquial whereas [[αναγνωρίσιμος]] is rather formal. --[[User:Flyax|flyax]] 17:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC) | | :Something is «ευδιάκριτο» when we can see it because it is big enough or the weather is clear enough or the light is sufficient. On the other hand something has become «αγνώριστο» when it has changed so much that we can not recognize it. [[αναγνωρίσιμος]] can be used as an antonym of [[αγνώριστος]], but be careful. When something is «αγνώριστο», it is not «αναγνωρίσιμο» - unless we exagerate, something that happens very often with this word- but when something is not «αναγνωρίσιμο», it doesn't necessarily mean that it is «αγνώριστο». Another difference is that [[αγνώριστος]] is rather colloquial whereas [[αναγνωρίσιμος]] is rather formal. --[[User:Flyax|flyax]] 17:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言