Talk:Canis domesticus Mar 31st 2012, 06:07 ← Older revision | Revision as of 06:07, 31 March 2012 | Line 6: | Line 6: | | ::But if it was never adopted, then it's not Translingual, and that's part of the issue. In what langauge(s) is it citable? If it's only in the one work of Linnaeus, then it's only Latin. But, if it's a one-off descriptive phrase in Latin, it may not merit an entry. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC) | | ::But if it was never adopted, then it's not Translingual, and that's part of the issue. In what langauge(s) is it citable? If it's only in the one work of Linnaeus, then it's only Latin. But, if it's a one-off descriptive phrase in Latin, it may not merit an entry. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC) | | :I figure it deserves an entry because someone who found it wouldn't be able to find it in up-to-date reference works (because it's not official)... so we should define it. I've made it Latin per this discussion, though. If anything else needs to be done, do it. :) Cheers, [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)}} | | :I figure it deserves an entry because someone who found it wouldn't be able to find it in up-to-date reference works (because it's not official)... so we should define it. I've made it Latin per this discussion, though. If anything else needs to be done, do it. :) Cheers, [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)}} | | + | | | + | ==Latin quotation== | | + | Removed from the entry: | | + | * '''1843''', ''Eman. Swedenborgii Diarii Spiritualis'', ''De Cane'', page 96: | | + | *: 3679. In somno visus canis, niger, qui prius admissus, sicut '''canis domesticus''', et cum vidit aliquid osseum in quo cutis alius canis, fastidivit, inde quoque admissus et non pro malo habitus; {{...}} | | |
沒有留言:
張貼留言