| ← Older revision | Revision as of 11:53, 23 September 2011 |
| Line 65: | Line 65: |
| | A race on a circuit - SoP. [[User:Ultimateria|Ultimateria]] 20:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | | A race on a circuit - SoP. [[User:Ultimateria|Ultimateria]] 20:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
| | :Def looks fairly specific to [[w:Road cycle racing]], where the term seems most used. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 20:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | | :Def looks fairly specific to [[w:Road cycle racing]], where the term seems most used. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 20:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
| - | | |
| - | == <s>[[beetle]]</s> == | |
| - | | |
| - | rfd-sense: "Nickname of two models of car made by Volkswagen." This should be [[Beetle]], though since it's a mark of car I'd prefer just to delete it. I mean, it's not just a nickname, there is a VW Beetle. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 15:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | : So, you know this meaning, but you want to keep it for yourself? And you don't want to provide translations (the French equivalent is [[coccinelle]])? It's a nickname. But moving it to [[Beetle]] might be justified, I'm not sure. [[User:Lmaltier|Lmaltier]] 21:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | | |
| - | '''moved to RFV''' -- [[User:Prince Kassad|Prince Kassad]] 15:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | |
| | | | |
| | == [[Zoloft]] == | | == [[Zoloft]] == |
| Line 126: | Line 119: |
| | ::::Again, I would argue for its inclusion because we do include arguably SoP constructions which also happen to be set phrases and fields of study, e.g. [[translation studies]], [[women's studies]], etc. [[User:Tooironic|---> Tooironic]] 23:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | | ::::Again, I would argue for its inclusion because we do include arguably SoP constructions which also happen to be set phrases and fields of study, e.g. [[translation studies]], [[women's studies]], etc. [[User:Tooironic|---> Tooironic]] 23:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| - | == <s>[[qyamancha]]</s> == | + | == <s>[[AB Yogurt]]</s> == |
| - | | |
| - | : ''Note: all referenced discussions have been archived to [[Talk:qyamancha]]. See there for background. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 23:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)'' | |
| - | | |
| - | I marked this '''RFV failed''' and pseudo-deleted accordingly (by moving it sans redirect to [[Citations:qyamancha]], and formatting it as a citations page), and no one objected in the RFV discussion itself, but {{user|Doremítzwr}} left a comment at my talk-page disagreeing, and I now see that he left a comment at {{user|Vahagn Petrosyan}}'s talk-page as well, and to judge by Vahagn's reply, Vahagn also disagrees with the pseudo-deletion. | |
| - | | |
| - | I think I acted correctly — the citations given don't seem to be "durably archived" to me, and I couldn't find any durably archived cites myself. (The only Google Books hit is a mention with attribution to Wikipedia; Google Groups turns up no Usenet hits; and Google Scholar and Google News Archive both turn up blanks.) However, Doremítzwr believes that the citations ''are'' durably archived, so I'd like input from third parties, if possible. | |
| - | | |
| - | (This may actually be better as a BP discussion, or as a new RFV discussion, but since (1) we're only discussing one entry at the moment and (2) the previous RFV discussion failed to garner comments, I thought I'd bring it here first.) | |
| - | | |
| - | —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 23:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | :Perhaps the problem is how can a one word title convey meaning? If there was a very famous painting called [[Wiktionary]], what definition would that justify for the word? [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 23:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | | |
| - | :: Well, I'm not sure about the album, but the paintings do depict the instrument. (If you follow the links in [[Citations:qyamancha]], you can see pictures of them.) That's not perfect — for example, none of the titles use an article, even though I'm almost positive that in a sentence one would say "a qyamancha" rather than simply "qyamancha" — but it's not the worst thing ever. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 02:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | | |
| - | : '''Delete.''' I am not perfectly sure, but the reasoning that you have shown in RFV (see [[Talk:qyamancha]]) seems valid to me, so this word should be deleted as having failed RFV. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] 09:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |
| - | | |
| - | '''closed''', there doesn't seem to be any kind of consensus for restoring the entry -- [[User:Liliana-60|Liliana]] [[User talk:Liliana-60|•]] 04:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC) | |
| - | | |
| - | == [[AB Yogurt]] == | |
| | | | |
| | If this is a proper noun, it must be a brand name. If it isn't, it's bad<!--whoops, missed a key word--> capitalization, and sum of parts. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | | If this is a proper noun, it must be a brand name. If it isn't, it's bad<!--whoops, missed a key word--> capitalization, and sum of parts. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
| Line 133: | Line 126: |
| | | | |
| | ::Was bold and just moved it to [[AB-yogurt]]. [[User:Mutante|Mutante]] 14:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | | ::Was bold and just moved it to [[AB-yogurt]]. [[User:Mutante|Mutante]] 14:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC) |
| | + | :::'''Striking''' as no input for 11 months. --[[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 11:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| | == [[-omics]] == | | == [[-omics]] == |
沒有留言:
張貼留言