| | :There are a few problems with this. The main problem is, that means that any combination of words where at least one of them has two meanings being allowed. So, [[readily]] has two meanings, [[I readily agreed]] and [[I readily said yes]] would meet CFI. They're both attested. [[I]] has more than one meaning anyway, so ''any'' combination of words including the word ''I'' meets CFI. There are other objections, but if I lump them all in one message, the conversation will get too sparse. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 15:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | | :There are a few problems with this. The main problem is, that means that any combination of words where at least one of them has two meanings being allowed. So, [[readily]] has two meanings, [[I readily agreed]] and [[I readily said yes]] would meet CFI. They're both attested. [[I]] has more than one meaning anyway, so ''any'' combination of words including the word ''I'' meets CFI. There are other objections, but if I lump them all in one message, the conversation will get too sparse. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 15:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
| | ::IMO, the alternative, keeping SOP the way it is, is much worse. It means that phrases that aren't crystal clear are being deleted anyway. SOP really is in conflict with NOTPAPER [[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="purple">Purplebackpack89</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="FFAB00">(Notes Taken)</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Purplebackpack89|<font color="FFAB00">(Locker)</font>]]</sup> 20:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | | ::IMO, the alternative, keeping SOP the way it is, is much worse. It means that phrases that aren't crystal clear are being deleted anyway. SOP really is in conflict with NOTPAPER [[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="purple">Purplebackpack89</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="FFAB00">(Notes Taken)</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Purplebackpack89|<font color="FFAB00">(Locker)</font>]]</sup> 20:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
| | + | : CFI are not clear, and misunderstood, because thay are much too complex. The simple way would be to clearly state: ''all words (including set phrases) used in a language and that may be considered as belonging to the vocabulary of the language may be included''. [[User:Lmaltier|Lmaltier]] 20:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言