Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]: Wiktionary:Requests for verification

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en] Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.

Wiktionary:Requests for verification Apr 2nd 2012, 06:17 ‎keek: ← Older revision Revision as of 06:17, 2 April 2012 (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) Line 1,373: Line 1,373:       ::Ah, both are citeable via Usenet, as misspellings of imbalance(d). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 20:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)   ::Ah, both are citeable via Usenet, as misspellings of imbalance(d). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 20:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)   +   + :::Given the user's recent creation of [[chemical imbalance]] as an alt form(!), this was clearly [[error/mistake distinction|a mistake or an error]]; I've moved the pages. They may or may not still be SOP. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 06:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)       == [[inbalance]] ==   == [[inbalance]] == Line 1,382: Line 1,384:       : I found two on Google Books searching on "keek" "exclaimed": [[http://books.google.com/books?id=jjNMAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA82&dq=%22Keek%22+%22exclaimed%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I5R3T4CCFaO1iQfYpNzNBA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Keek%22%20%22exclaimed%22&f=false]] and [[http://books.google.com/books?id=gCPaj0C-hk0C&pg=PA141&dq=%22Keek%22+%22exclaimed%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I5R3T4CCFaO1iQfYpNzNBA&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Keek%22%20%22exclaimed%22&f=false]]. I found one on Usenet (Google Groups) [[http://www.future-crew.net/forum/index.php?topic=467.45]], but it is nonsense, spam or something. [[User:BenjaminBarrett12|BenjaminBarrett12]] ([[User talk:BenjaminBarrett12|talk]]) 01:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)   : I found two on Google Books searching on "keek" "exclaimed": [[http://books.google.com/books?id=jjNMAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA82&dq=%22Keek%22+%22exclaimed%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I5R3T4CCFaO1iQfYpNzNBA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Keek%22%20%22exclaimed%22&f=false]] and [[http://books.google.com/books?id=gCPaj0C-hk0C&pg=PA141&dq=%22Keek%22+%22exclaimed%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I5R3T4CCFaO1iQfYpNzNBA&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Keek%22%20%22exclaimed%22&f=false]]. I found one on Usenet (Google Groups) [[http://www.future-crew.net/forum/index.php?topic=467.45]], but it is nonsense, spam or something. [[User:BenjaminBarrett12|BenjaminBarrett12]] ([[User talk:BenjaminBarrett12|talk]]) 01:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)   +   + :: At least one of those might be using the other etymology of "keek", i.e. might be exclaiming "look!" [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 06:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)       == [[( )*( )]] ==   == [[( )*( )]] ==

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions