| | ::::::: And I need another test noun where neither the noun nor its plural have a macron. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 06:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | ::::::: And I need another test noun where neither the noun nor its plural have a macron. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 06:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | :::::::: I'll get on the test nouns asap, I hope I can find a couple of useful ones soon. As for the categories, usually I include animate and inanimate for concrete nouns, because it determines pluralization, though in practice some agentive formations can have animate or inanimate referents. Abstract nouns are usually inanimate, or rather, aren't really animate or inanimate, they're just abstract. I'm no expert, though, might need to look into that. As for usual plural suffixes there's {{term|-tin|lang=nci}} and {{term|-h|lang=nci}} which can trigger reduplication and {{term|-meh|lang=nci}} and {{term|-queh|lang=nci}} which don't, also ''-queh'' is usually reserved for agent nouns. Overall, though, pluralization isn't really very predictable so I don't know how practical a template would be, though again I'm not the one programming, haha. I don't know if I told you what you needed to know, tell me if I just got you sidetracked. —[[User:Koszmonaut|Koszmonaut]] ([[User talk:Koszmonaut|talk]]) 07:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | :::::::: I'll get on the test nouns asap, I hope I can find a couple of useful ones soon. As for the categories, usually I include animate and inanimate for concrete nouns, because it determines pluralization, though in practice some agentive formations can have animate or inanimate referents. Abstract nouns are usually inanimate, or rather, aren't really animate or inanimate, they're just abstract. I'm no expert, though, might need to look into that. As for usual plural suffixes there's {{term|-tin|lang=nci}} and {{term|-h|lang=nci}} which can trigger reduplication and {{term|-meh|lang=nci}} and {{term|-queh|lang=nci}} which don't, also ''-queh'' is usually reserved for agent nouns. Overall, though, pluralization isn't really very predictable so I don't know how practical a template would be, though again I'm not the one programming, haha. I don't know if I told you what you needed to know, tell me if I just got you sidetracked. —[[User:Koszmonaut|Koszmonaut]] ([[User talk:Koszmonaut|talk]]) 07:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | ::::::::::Honestly, I'm a crappy programmer, I just know how wikis work (I had to learn when I made my website). Anyway, all I got from that is that pluralisation is crazy and there's no damn way I can hardcode it, so you'll have to supply it as usual. I'm just hoping to save you ''some'' time. I just realized that I could just delete some plurals you've created to do testing, but maybe it'd be better if you created test entries for me. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 07:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言