| | The entomology seems very emphasized, while the definition is further down the page. This may be more of a general thing, I just clicked on the feedback button and it brought me here. Thanks! EDIT: Overall, the definition I feel should be of more importance. | | The entomology seems very emphasized, while the definition is further down the page. This may be more of a general thing, I just clicked on the feedback button and it brought me here. Thanks! EDIT: Overall, the definition I feel should be of more importance. |
| | : This is the format Wiktionary has chosen to adopt. Etymology first, then definition. [[User:Jamesjiao|Jamesjiao]] → <sup><small>[[User talk:Jamesjiao|T]] ◊ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesjiao|C]]</small></sup> 02:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC) | | : This is the format Wiktionary has chosen to adopt. Etymology first, then definition. [[User:Jamesjiao|Jamesjiao]] → <sup><small>[[User talk:Jamesjiao|T]] ◊ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesjiao|C]]</small></sup> 02:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | : We only have around 400 entries categorised in [[:Category:en:Insects]] and its subcategories. Even considering insects' entries lacking proper categorisation, I'd say we are lacking in, not emphasising, entomology. — ''[[User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Ungoliant]] <sup>([[User Talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Falai]])</sup>'' 03:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言