| Wiktionary:Requests for verification Dec 2nd 2012, 03:18 sæculier: | ← Older revision | Revision as of 03:18, 2 December 2012 | | Line 1,487: | Line 1,487: | | | :: Prospects may be bleak, but not so unfathomable as to deprive the entry of a month. [[User talk:DAVilla|DAVilla]] 11:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | | :: Prospects may be bleak, but not so unfathomable as to deprive the entry of a month. [[User talk:DAVilla|DAVilla]] 11:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | | | | | | | − | == [[sæculier]] == | + | == <s>[[sæculier]]</s> == | | | | | | | | French. Author speedied it claiming a lack of cites, but I brought it here instead of deleting in case he's wrong.<span class="Unicode">​—[[User:Msh210|msh210]]℠</span> ([[user talk:Msh210|talk]]) 06:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | French. Author speedied it claiming a lack of cites, but I brought it here instead of deleting in case he's wrong.<span class="Unicode">​—[[User:Msh210|msh210]]℠</span> ([[user talk:Msh210|talk]]) 06:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | Line 1,493: | Line 1,493: | | | :Cited, I think. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | :Cited, I think. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | | :: Looks good, follows the spelling rules of the age trying to 're-etymologize' words to look like their Latin etyma, no reason to think it's not legit [[IMO]]. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 11:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | :: Looks good, follows the spelling rules of the age trying to 're-etymologize' words to look like their Latin etyma, no reason to think it's not legit [[IMO]]. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 11:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | | | + | | | | + | :Passed. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 03:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC) | | | | | | | | == [[horsefeather]] == | | == [[horsefeather]] == | |  |
沒有留言:
張貼留言