| | :::::::For our purposes, some examples have been lexicalized. I'm not sure that we have a "context"-type label that is both accurate and intelligible by ordinary dictionary users. "Cant" might be the best we can do, unless there has emerged some term to characterize this particular cant. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 13:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC) | | :::::::For our purposes, some examples have been lexicalized. I'm not sure that we have a "context"-type label that is both accurate and intelligible by ordinary dictionary users. "Cant" might be the best we can do, unless there has emerged some term to characterize this particular cant. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 13:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC) |
| | ::::::::Words like "bizatch" seem to have become more widespread than most -iz- terms. I think "cant" should be part of etymology, not a {{temp|context}}. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 18:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC) | | ::::::::Words like "bizatch" seem to have become more widespread than most -iz- terms. I think "cant" should be part of etymology, not a {{temp|context}}. [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 18:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | I've received an email on the subject of [[User:Torvalu4]] and his insistence on putting Albanian into Romanian etymologies, removing all other etymologies. The email was inappropriate as it addresses me personally and I have no knowledge on the subject so I have nothing useful to add. So am bringing it up here. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 18:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言