| | I propose that <tt>st</tt> be removed. Should it ever be used, outside of [[st]] and the few visually similar entries which link thither? My understanding is that it should not, that <tt>st</tt> should be used. I also propose that <tt>ᵈ ⁿ ʳ ˢ ᵗ</tt> be removed unless they have legitimate uses which are more common than, say, Runic (which is also legitimate but was removed by Liliana as not common enough to merit inclusion). <tt>ʰ ʷ</tt> are used in writing PIE, I know... I think the others were primarily misused by a single editor to represent superscripts in e.g. <tt>2ⁿᵈ</tt> (which should have been <tt>2</tt><sup><tt>nd</tt></sup>). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 21:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | | I propose that <tt>st</tt> be removed. Should it ever be used, outside of [[st]] and the few visually similar entries which link thither? My understanding is that it should not, that <tt>st</tt> should be used. I also propose that <tt>ᵈ ⁿ ʳ ˢ ᵗ</tt> be removed unless they have legitimate uses which are more common than, say, Runic (which is also legitimate but was removed by Liliana as not common enough to merit inclusion). <tt>ʰ ʷ</tt> are used in writing PIE, I know... I think the others were primarily misused by a single editor to represent superscripts in e.g. <tt>2ⁿᵈ</tt> (which should have been <tt>2</tt><sup><tt>nd</tt></sup>). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 21:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | : Re: <tt>st</tt>: I agree, remove it. Re: superscript letters: I say remove them all, including <tt>ʰ ʷ</tt>, from the "Miscellaneous" section. <tt>ʰ ʷ</tt> are already in the "IPA" section, and can be added somewhere else for PIE if desired, but their current location is inappropriate. (There are quite a few things in the "Miscellaneous" section that aren't needed, IMHO.) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 21:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
沒有留言:
張貼留言